An Immanent Criticism of Urban Design in Montevideo


  • Washington MORALES Universidad de la República, Uruguay



Immanent Criticism, Urban Design, Democracy, Aestheticization


The debate about the so called “excluding design” has been a focus for applied philosophy for several years. The structure of this debate is constituted by deontological and consequentialist’s applied ethics and as well as agonistic democratic approaches. This paper asks for the applicability of these points of view to the particular socio-political reality of Montevideo. Examining this reality closer, I hold that we cannot comprehend the recent aestheticization of the excluding design there through these contemporary philosophical frameworks. As an alternative philosophical procedure, I analyze the aestheticization of excluding design in Montevideo from Rahel Jaeggi’s immanent criticism. I hold that this process of aestheticization implies an ideological regressive “form of life”. And I also argue that the Uruguayan democracy is affected by this ideological regression. Nevertheless, because this aestheticization is not an exclusive Uruguayan phenomenon, this paper intends to open one direction in applied philosophy of urban design.




How to Cite

MORALES , W. . (2019). An Immanent Criticism of Urban Design in Montevideo. Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management, 2(1), 225–237.